[ About ]

We got tired of finding out about risk too late

Worksynk began as an internal tool for a team that kept finding scope creep in the retro.

01
The gap we kept falling into
Most project tools are very good at recording what happened. Very few are good at telling you what is about to happen. That gap — between a tidy board and an honest read on the week ahead — is where deadlines quietly slip and clients quietly lose trust.
We were running client delivery ourselves when we noticed the pattern: the retro was where we learned about scope creep. By then the conversation was about money instead of scheduling, which is a much worse conversation to have.
02
So we made the platform explain itself
Worksynk scores every active project, but the score is deliberately not a forecast. Each project starts at 100, and overdue work, blocked items, stale work, unowned critical items, and review lag each subtract a capped amount. Every deduction names the work items behind it.
That matters more than the number. A score you cannot interrogate is a score nobody acts on — and a prompt to go look at four specific items is worth more than a confident prediction nobody believes.
03
And we made the AI answerable
AI in delivery software has to be governed rather than merely enabled. A connected assistant runs as the person who authorised it and can never reach more than they can. Every tool call is recorded, and any connection can be revoked.
We are also explicit about the sharp edge: over a connected AI host, a write tool executes the moment it is called, with no confirmation prompt. That is why connections default to read-only, and why we say so on the product pages rather than in a footnote.

[ Performance metrics ]

/ fewer missed deadlines after 90 days: 40%
/ saved per PM, per week, on status reporting: 12 hrs
/ faster client sign-off and handoff: 3.2×
/ platform uptime, audited quarterly: 99.95%

[ What we believe ]

The principles behind the product.

How we decide features, claims and shortcuts.

01
Signal over noise
We'd rather ship one number you trust than ten dashboards you have to interpret.
02
Governance is a feature
Automation without an audit trail isn't automation you can defend to a client or a board.
03
Open by default
MCP-native, integration-friendly, and built to sit inside the tools you already run — not replace them all.
04
Built for the long project
Delivery software should still make sense on month eighteen of a client relationship, not just week one.

[ How we build ]

How we build it.

Four commitments on what ships.

Modules, not a monolith: The platform ships as 31 modules a workspace owner switches on. You carry what you use, and disabling one blocks its endpoints rather than just hiding a menu.
The docs are the spec: Product documentation and this website are written from the same source. If a page here claims something, it is because the product does it — not because it tested well as a headline.
We name what is not built: Roadmap items are labelled as not shipped. We would rather lose a deal on a missing integration than win one and have to explain its absence in onboarding.
Security is the first conversation: Client work means holding other people's credentials and contracts. Encryption, access logging, and the vault carve-out from AI exist because that is the first thing a serious client asks about.